Witam Co polecacie do NAS'a w domciu? McIntosh MA7200 Review + TV Show & Movie Reviews & News. May 01, 2017. Seagate Ironwolf o WD Red ? WD Red. With the amount of RAM and SSD based cache you'll be adding it doesn't really matter what HDD you use. W Zyxelu mam pojedynczy WD Red 6 TB, juz chyba ze 2 lata bedzie. WD comes in smaller units which is ideal when your application is on a limited scale. I am so stoked to be building my 1st NAS. Tak myslę o 4TB lub 6TB w Raid Mirror. Some have failed, those things happen ofcourse. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives in … Wish I understood their practical implications. The 7200 rpm drives use more power and the Toshiba's seem to be the loudest if those matter. Joined Jan 4, 2007 Messages 1,373 Reaction score 50 Points 51 Location Based on 1,896 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. JavaScript is disabled. Is there a contender I missed? WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. For the life of me I cannot find a good empirical reason prefer one brand over another. There is a difference. Obviously the main choices are: Can anyone point me towards a demonstrable advantage to one of these choices? They all have the same warranty and the same/similar features. I also ordered 32GB RAM, and a 1TB SSD for the cache drive. Ciao a tutti, ... volevo sapere quale HDD sia meglio abbinare tra: Seagate Iron wolf e Western Digital Red come taglio di storage penso di stare o su 4 o su 6tb cadauno ma molto dipenderà anche dal prezzo che troverò in rete. Stale przesuwamy granice w zakresie pojemności pamięci masowej, zdecydowanie wyprzedzając konkurencję. company number 03997482, registered in England and Wales. I have 2 WD Red 4TB, and now I am worried. X. AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited, So the plan is to buy 2 x NAS grade CMR drives. Welcome to your friendly /r/homelab, where techies and sysadmin from everywhere are welcome to share their labs, projects, builds, etc. But will spend what's needed to do it right. Edit:In the end it wasn't brand that swayed me, it was price. W ogole z WD zaskoczyl mnie tylko WD Black 4TB w pececie ktory zlapal skads 4 bad bloki. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … I currently have all three running in the same nas (regular red, not pro). See all prices. You must log in or register to reply here. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. The dimensions are 5.78 x 4 x 1.03 inches and it weighs 1.34 pounds. - Western Digital Red or Red Pro - Seagate IronWolf - Toshiba N300. Czy ktoś z Was ma doświadczenia z dyskami Toshiba? Fan is running constantly .. Room is only 17 degrees where NAS is stored- Replacing WD RED 3TB with Seagate Ironwolf 4TB Bart. There really isn't a reason to pick one over the others. Seagate IronWolf. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Just try to stay away from SMR drives. Przede wszystkim, dyski Seagate IronWolf są projektowane na większe obciążenie w stosunku do serii WD Red, w przypadku której jest to 120 TB rocznie. Pro: Alta affidabilità; Ottime prestazioni; Ridotta rumorosità e sviluppo di calore Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I use the WD RED pro in RAID 10 for primary backup and RAID 6 for archive backup and find them very reliable with most failures out of the box or in the first 24 hour burn in period It is red and black with the signature hexagon design from WD. Seagate ironwolf vs ironwolf pro SD. Seagate IronWolf, 1 TB, NAS... Seagate IronWolf NAS. HGST perhaps? Haunted NAS Drives keep "disappearing" after a while of being visible?! Sep 30, 2020. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. From a price standpoint, both products are between $210 and $220, depending on your e-tailer preference. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. View. ... Western Digital Red Pro 6TB... WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB. Rozważam WD Red oraz Toshiba N300. It may not display this or other websites correctly. I have already bought two, but I may buy another after confirming that my PC supports more than two disks. The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. It is 5.79 x 4 x 1.03 inches and it weighs 1.30 pounds. My question is: should I buy WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf for the Synology? As you can see, WD Red is available up to 8 GB, whereas Seagate Ironwolf Pro provides up to 12 GB of storage. They run a full 6 degrees warmer than my WD Red in idle and know the TS251 warns of too warm drives (S.M.A.R.T). When you need the massive amount of storage, you can go with Seagate Ironwolf Pro as it has bigger storage capacities up to 12 GB. Is there a contender I missed? There hasn't really been any differences in performance between the 7200 and 5200 rpm drives because of cache and other limits. The hard drive is green, black, and red with the striking IronWolf logo in the middle. W poprzednim Zyxelu mialem (a wlasciwie to mam ale nie uzywam) inny WD Red 2 TB i tez zawsze pieknie. I have a wd red I got a year and a half ago and it is CMR. Can anyone point me towards a demonstrable advantage to one of these choices? Pick the drive with the best warranty and go from there. I appreciate the numbers. The price/performance seem to be nearly on par across the board. WD Red or Seagate IronWolf. All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. Seagate IronWolf, WD RED, a może HGST (choć to właściwie teraz chyba WD Also: 5200RPM vs 7200RPM does it matter for this basic use case? and you DO have a backup....don't you?? Given all the great advice you have given over the years, I am about to buy my first "real" NAS, the Synology DS220+. Join the AVForums team live on Wednesdays at 7pm UK time. The following will give you a comparison of Seagate vs Western Digital HDD, which introduces the differences on reliability, speed, capacity of the two HDD brands. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. It's going to be your basic SMB / FTP / Plex setup. Even the author describes the variations described in his Annualized Failure Rate chart as a "... trivial increase .. well within a normal variation.". Teraz powoli mysle o kolejnym 6 TB ale Seagate, bo tanszy a WD zamiast 1 Home Entertainment Tech Community & Resource. Now I'm in the process of choosing what drives to fill the 4 x 3.5" bays with. I compared some costs via http://diskprices.com/. … Seagate Ironwolf 4TB not showing Ironwolf Health Dougneedshelp. I know I need at least 10TB to start. Powered by Xenforo, Hosted by Nimbus Hosting, Original design Critical Media Ltd. The drives are mostly for long-term storage of music, movies and ROMs. Price are somewhat the same. £47.81. Newegg shows the WD Red 4TB at $209.99 and the Seagate … Prior to commenting on the other possible use-cases, one thing is clear from the above pricing matrix - if you absolutely require 18TB per disk, the WD Gold, WD Red Pro, Seagate IronWolf … The No. I usually buy on price when there's a difference. Very noisy drives - can be heard from the neighbor room. Check the product nu.bers against the list of smr drives they posted. Seagate IronWolf (6-12 TB) Seagate IronWolf (4 TB) WD Red (8-12 TB) WD Red (4 TB) 24/7 operation: YES: RPM: 7200: 5900 ~5400: Max sustained data transfer rate: 210 MB/s: 180 MB/s: 210 MB/s: 178 MB/s: Cache: 256 MB: 64 MB: 256 MB: 64 MB: RAID support: All configurations: Enclosure: 1-8 bay: Up to 8-bay or rack mounted: Workload: 180 TB/year: MTBF: 1 million hours: Unrecoverable read … Should not be very old or having any bad sectors please. Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. IronWolf (Seagate) raczej odrzucam, ze względu na złe doświadczenia z Seagate w przeszłości. https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html. Da der Preis ziemlich knapp aneinander ist, spielt dieser bei der Entscheidung keine Rolle. WD Red Pro : The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. Oct 15, 2018. Press J to jump to the feed. Amazon. Location London ReflexReact Active Member. I'd get wd my book/elements and shuck them, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I have dozens of external drives and am very excited to consolidate all that data into a storage solution with some redundancy. I have just built my first NAS from an old computer but need a second disk to get started. Many thanks . This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. The Winner Is- A Tie who cares if they're under warranty? Wszystko cacy. Advertiser Disclosure. You are using an out of date browser. Turns out shucking WD branded external drives was the most cost effective way to get high-capacity NAS drives. Europe's busiest forums, with independent news and expert reviews, for TVs, Home Cinema, Hi-Fi, Movies, Gaming, Tech and more. Aren't the Seagates faster? Does a 2% difference really matter for this use case? Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. I am not sure about WD now. This website uses the TMDb API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDb. What's the difference between their HDD products? I've used WD Red's for like 99% of my units. We will be including the following drives as comparables in the NETGEAR 628x configuration: Seagate IronWolf Pro (12TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) Wychodząc naprzeciw wyjątkowym wyzwaniom związanym z rozwojem masowej pamięci danych, firma Seagate® opracowała wiodące w swojej kategorii dyski IronWolf® i IronWolf Pro o pojemności 16 TB do sieciowej pamięci masowej (NAS), aby pomóc Ci w osiąganiu założonych celów. Inaczej wygląda także sprawa z pamięcią cache, która w wariancie 256 MB dostępna jest w serii Red dopiero w najdroższych, 10 TB dyskach, podczas gdy dla HDD Seagate’a – 7, 8 i 10 TB. in two weeks I lost one Seagate Ironwolf and 1 WD Red (3 years old). The reality is, other than certain specific models with widespread known issues, You get drives that fail and drives that last until you retire them from all brands. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red … Do tej pory wszystkie dyski, które kupowałem to WD Red, nie mam z nimi problemów - ale może czas dać szansę innej firmie? The RED Pro and Ironwolf level drives are also stated to run longer and manage vibration issues etc but how much this is fact vs spin is open to debate. Zobacz inne Dyski twarde, najtańsze i najlepsze oferty, opinie. Podcast: One system for both Hi-Fi & Cinema? If anyone has a 4/6/8 TB WD Red (CMR version) or Seagate Ironwolf NAS HDD that they want to get rid of then please let me know. But I am thinking about buying a new NAS and I just can't choose which drive. I'd like to save the money if the difference would be negligible. I was originally thinking that a pair of 6TB would be good for what I need the NAS to do, but with the WD SMR/CMR issue, I'm now looking at 8TB drives to eliminate that issue. In the reviews I see lots of anecdotes praising or slagging off one or another brand, but I'm looking for actual data to guide my choice. Copyright © 2000-2021 M2N Limited E. & O.E. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/309730-western-digital-comes-clean-shares-which-hard-drives-use-smr. As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). Rating - 100%. Once I have redundant local storage setup, my next project will be tape backup or maybe something like AWS S3 Glacier. I got a HPE ProLiant Microserver Gen10 AMD x3421 cheap on ebay. 26 0 0. I´ve just installed two Seagate Ironwolf 8TB, and I am so dissapointed with these drives. Dysk twardy Seagate IronWolf 4TB 6Gb/s SATA (ST4000VN008) - od 469,00 zł, porównanie cen w 39 sklepach. And they have special software build in. In the following section of this review, we will test 8 Seagate IronWolf 12TB HDDs performance in both iSCSI and CIFS configurations inside a Netgear 628x (RAID6). Looking at … Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. HGST perhaps? For now, we're testing the leading 10TB helium HDDs from HGST and Seagate, and the 8TB WD Gold.